Safe Passage to AI
Formal foundations: TOGAF Architecture Maturity Models

The TOGAF Architecture Capability Maturity Model (ACMM) is the foundation from which the ICL CMM is derived. Where the ICL CMM applies to the whole organization, the TOGAF CMM focuses specifically on the EA practice and its nine characteristics.
TOGAF’s Architecture Capability Framework draws on several CMM variants:
| Level | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| M0 | None | No architecture capability |
| M1 | Initial | Ad-hoc, unorganised |
| M2 | Under Development | Processes being defined |
| M3 | Defined | Documented and standardised |
| M4 | Managed | Measured and controlled |
| M5 | Optimising | Continuous improvement |
Each characteristic is assessed independently across M0–M5, giving a multi-dimensional view rather than a single score.
Practical use: the CMM “meter” identifies specific capability gaps rather than blanket immaturity statements — useful for targeted improvement roadmaps.
The ICL ADM requires the client organisation to be at ACMM maturity level M3 or above across all nine characteristics. Effective ADM execution is capability-gated.
| Level | Implication |
|---|---|
| M0–M1 | EA becomes ineffective without foundational structures |
| M2 | Minimum viable governance emerging |
| M3+ | EA can function with documented standards and executive support |
Capability Maturity Models were developed by the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) at Carnegie Mellon University in 1987 to assess and improve software development processes. Originally created to help the U.S. Department of Defense evaluate contractor capabilities, CMM has since evolved into CMMI, covering broader business areas.
Reference: TOGAF Architecture Maturity Models
© dbj@dbj.org , CC BY SA 4.0